Mr Khan said:
The elimination of corporate personhood would in no way impact those things. The individuals who compose corporations would still have all their rights, just not the right to act anonymously behind the corporate veil in matters of influencing the course of American politics. Or we can go with the "public funding only" one, where the most corporations would be reduced to is the indirect creation of aid. |
How's that? People currently don't forfeit their right to speak freely just because they come together in a group, but that's exactly what you're suggesting they do. That's eviscerating the First Amendment, however you justify it.
As for public funding, I'd rather not be forced to pay for the political campaigns of people I don't support while being prevented from supporting the candidates I do like, thanks.







