Pokemonbrawlvg said:
A good score. USA Today gave 3DS a 3.25/4 when it first launched. I think they should a re-review now that it has more games, applications, and a price cut, but it's alright since most people are smart enough to know what's recent. The Vita launch is better than the 3DS launch, but how will it hold in the long run? Will it receive a price cut if it doesn't sell well? Will they discontinue the 3G? What will happen to it if it doesn't do will? But, we should keep a postive mind about these launchs. 3DS had a rough start, but now it's the fastest selling console. The Vita should do better in the Americas and Europe, though i'm a bit lost with Europe since it's a bit like Japan with sales. |
Yeah, but I don't think 3DS had itself compared to Smartphones and tablets in it's review. If 3DS was compared in the same way it would have scored less than it's 3.25.
You can't look at Vita score and think 3DS should be near it because like I said, it was fortunate to be reviewed as what it was and not as what it wasn't. Not to mention the 3DS doesn't even offer the same functionality and gaming possibilities as the Vita. They are very different, not to mention the Vita rightfully scores higher for the better launch lineup and superior tech. Scoring them anywhere near similar would be outrageous.
Serious question: Why does it seem to bother you so much that the Vita is rated as a better peice of tech than the 3DS when it is in fact true and price won't change that?
Be happy that it is even rated anywhere near as close. Vita undeniably has better graphics, controls, gameplay input possiblities and much more robust online experience.
iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.
Currently playing:
Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)
