enrageorange said:
uhh you couldnt be more wrong. 360 owners who play on other consoles/pc might be disappointed since they could have just gotten multiplatform titles on their other systems, but 360 only owners times are the ones who are very happy. Just these holidays excluding kinect games they got MW3, Skyrim, battlefield 3, gears 3, arkham city, AC revelations, halo anniversary, forza 4, dark souls, dues ex, saints row the third, dead island, and rage. Considering that no console ever has even had a tie ratio as high as the number of big games that came out these holidays, let alone this past year, 360 only gamers were certainly not disappointed with the recent 360 lineup and 99% of them couldnt even get all the retail games they were interested in. Now on the other hand you can easily make the arguement that multiconsole owners could have been dissappointed with the 360 lineup. But what you said is just absurd. |
Obviously the higher percentage of gamers own a 360 (who go to them first?). No one is doubting that; however, I am saying that they will be dependent on XBLA since they wont be providing retail titles for our audience. Third party titles are a given. If this is your argument then thank third parties for making your 360 experience better. I dont attribute third party work to a first party, sorry. The only 360 exclusive I've played in a year (outside of multiplatforms) is Gears 3 and I loved it. If they dont fix this...once I get my gaming laptop, My 360 will collect dust or not even exist at all. Having Steam easily remedies not having Live as I just got an account and was wowed by it.
With that said XBLA is great and Indy titles deserve for face time. Lets see how long MS gives it to them.
