| osamanobama said:
what, source? you know the development cost fo those games? games like MLB the show are low budget, yearly release sports games, Ratchet and Clank seems to be of much lower budget than the previous 2 entries on PS3, also made by a secondary team. i fail to see how .8 million sales in 4 months isnt enough to make profit. So uncharted needs to sell 8 million to be profitable, or am i reading that wrong? i also dont know why you say it will sell 5.5 million at best when its predessor is has already sold more than that, and is on pace for 6 million, and Uncharted 3 is selling more and faster than Uncharted 2, so i see no reason why i couldnt reach more than 6 million sales. really this whole thread is shocking, people are asking for LESS GAMES. i would never have thought i would here that on a gaming website, but perhaps people are on to something, after all xbox is hugely successful, and outsells PS3. so i guess for some less games is a good thing. i may be in the minority but for me MORE games is a good thing. thats all i care about. |
lol, how do you not see it? Sony is bleeding. If they make more games, in the long run, you will have EVEN LESS GAMES (keep making tons of in-house games and go bankrupt) than LESS GAMES (slow down development, market the hell out of certain games).
In the end, those people are asking for MORE GAMES. Not on the short term like you are of course, but rather on the long term.
