| o_O.Q said:
" If it is a 40" LCD with a thinner debth compared to a vita's surface to depth ratio, then for all suits and purposes it is less bulky. " ...so according to you
|
A great example of lumping. Good work.
Where I just discussed with Kitler that it all depends what you're mesuring, and took the time to define 2 metrics (total volume versus surface to depth ratio), and explain the difference between mesuring bulk in two contexts (portability versus design), you just throw them all back together.
To further illustrate how limited your logic is, I'll use a counter example via the volume metric.
Take this technology:
It's 55" across and 4 millimeters thick. If we were to take its volume, at an aspect ratio of 16:9, we have the following dimensions.
47.9394" w x 26.9659" h x 0.1575" w
Volume: 203.60 cube inches
Surface to depth ratio: 8207.80 (the bigger this is, the sleeker the design)
The thing weighs 16.5 pounds, which can be shocking to you.
All depending on which metric you choose, one can be considered sleeker than the other. In this occurence, the 55" LG TV would be sleeker than both a Vita and a Wii U controller by considering the Surface to depth ratio. In terms of volume, it is slightly smaller than 2 Wii U Controllers ducktaped together.
