| kitler53 said:
i do, but more importantly you also get the point. listen, i don't know why i'm picking on you. most likely it's because i'm a dick. i don't particulary ever remember you actually falling into the "elitest nintendo fan" category that i put out there. but in life, a lot of time anger is misdirected. but as your post so elegantly shows, there is an evolution of ideas around all companies in any market. successful new ideas become industry standards. also, please forgive my typo about sq inches, i obviously meant in^3. |
I do, I'm not an idiot :) As long as you're clear, I can understand you. When lines are fuzzy, it's really hard to hit a moving target, unless you're great at anticipation. I'm not there just yet. Thanks for italics.
:D I don't think I am an elitist nintendo fan :), but I like to make sense of things, that's for sure. When things don't make sense to me, I like to bring them out. I try not to be a jerk. You might remember that I voted for you a while back in one of the vote your favorite user threads (early in 2010, back when my nick was still padib). Lately you've been getting a tad on the bitter side, but I can understand it. One of the reasons I voted for you back then was because I knew you were a Sony fan, but you were able to put that aside to make sense of things. But in the context where you're essentially saying Nintendo is not innovating, it's a position that's hard to defend. If you stayed nuanced and said "Nintendo brought this and that aspect as an innovation, but this or that idea was there already", then you would be in a much better position to hold your ground. And it would actually address the gripe you had, about people lumping concepts together in one big ambiguous statement.
Anyway, I didn't feel like you were picking on me, but I appreciate the post. Hey, if rage is your issue, geez go no further, your pal is here. Rage is one of my biggest issues, but thank God I've been working on it. Consider boxing as a hobby, it really helps me alot.
