If you actually read the review, it would be clear why. The reviewer was expecting great things; for the issues in the original to be fixed, and they weren't. This left the reviewer feeling disappointed and was left with an average game at best. Hence the score. Remember, 5 is average, 7 is good, 8 is great. So he views it as slightly above average but ultimately disappointing.
Saying that:
"I'm astonished that a well-established website as this one could let publish such an aggressive pamphlet :("
Is a stupid statement. Any website can give any score and shouldn't be pressured into giving a mediocre game a good score just to please visitors to the site. I say kudos to the reviewer for writing his mind and not feeling pressured, and good on the admin staff for letting it be posted.
Finally, EDGE gave it a 5, a few sites a 6 and one site a 1.5. This is not unheard of for this game, you know.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
