| OoSnap said: 1. This is just one of many examples of evolutionists' making false predictions. The paper claimed that the 16S ribosomal DNA from the Bacillus strain 2-9-3 is almost identical to modern one. You would also expect to evolve after 250 million years (supposedly) to another species. But didn't happen. 2. It shows once again evolutionists got it wrong. There is no such as "Junk DNA" or "non coding" DNA. |
This is going to be my last reply to this thread as we'll just end up in circles, but I'm just going to re-iterate that this is how science works. Predictions aren't "false" if they're made with the best available information. When new data is discovered then previous hypotheses are updated and new predictions are made. It's a self-improving system and continues to give more information on evolution. Just because some of the earlier predictions were wrong doesn't disprove evolution.
