RolStoppable said:
And this is why it's hard to respect you. You are always quick to agree with people who post fundamentally flawed arguments against the Wii and its owners. If the Wii and DS were only about new things, then nobody would have championed sequels to established Nintendo IPs as well as the Virtual Console (which includes third party games). It was about the old and the new. Third parties virtually only gave the new on the Wii and they did a crappy job at it, so it shouldn't be hard to understand why people were pissed. It's pretty evident that the Wii is capable of running the same genres as the HD consoles, because the PS2, a weaker console, could it too. |
thats why its kind of hard to take some of the things you say seriously, There ar some games that are on HD that CANNOT run on WIi, GTA, Assassins Creed, Mvs.C3, Elder Scrolls, Fallout 3, RE5 etc. These are games that would have hard time running on the Wii and if they could get it to run, it would still be worse than the HD counterparts, and would still sell less, look at COD, hell look at just about any multiplat that isnt a dance or exercise game. Its not about just running genres, which Wii cant run them all anyway (looking at you WRPGS). Its about quality of games, people are not going to want to play the inferior version of a game, which going by the sales they are not.
Im not saying that some games could not have worked, like an original actual RE, but it seems some Ninty fans forget or ignore that WIi hardware is much lower than the HD consoles, more powerful your hardware is, the more you can do, its not rocket science
