By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:
Play4Fun said:
o_O.Q said:
 

"Nintendo made dual analogs and motion controls relevant."

guess i misinterpretated what you said there and besides there were several consoles that used analogs before either of them like the vectrex... but in terms of relevance going by sales the ps1 and ps2 sold more than any of nintendo's home consoles so far

so i'd have to say that they played a bigger part in making analogs relevant ( if sales is what counts in making something relevant )


My bad, I meant Nintendo made analog sticks relevant, not dual analogs.

And it doesn't matter if PSone sold more than N64. N64 (and Mario 64) is the reason PSOne had the analog controller revision.

" N64 (and Mario 64) is the reason PSOne had the analog controller revision."

according to who?

edit : as far as i remember it was said the analogs were originally included to allow for better control in gran turismo

Why didn't PSOne launch with an analog controller but instead got DA about a year or so after N64?

N64 launched with Mario 64 and that game (plus pilotwings 64) showed how analogs could finally make gaming in a 3D environment intuitive.

There's nothing wrong with Sony recognising the possibilities of analogs with N64 and incorporating it in their console. I don't know why you are always so defensive about this subject.

As soon as I made that post to kitler I knew you would jump on it. I've seen you go on and on about this subject.