Mr Khan said:
I often have problems elocuting the point i'm trying to make, and the fallaciousness of your earlier argument is the underlying idea that people who need to justify who they are have to be guilty of something, which is not the case. It sits in similar with the fallacy regarding privacy laws "if you don't have anything to hide, you shouldn't be worried." Your "if you felt fully moral in your actions, you wouldn't have to justify it," works similarly, and fails the acid test of argument due to those problems You're projecting onto his motivations for not doing something that he is actually doing, a logical snarl. Although he does not overtly state it, his entire thesis revolves around the notion that "piracy is cheaper and easier and that's why i do it, because media should be cheaper and easier." |
do you realize that you keep repeating the point that i make?
he pirated because it is cheaper and easier, but he makes all the effort to describe it in a way it feels justifiable to him, that is all i am saying, and that is what you just said.
i really really don't see what you are trying to tell me here, or why we are even arguing.
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’







