zarx on 24 January 2012
doubt it
Why would they use a modified 6670 when a 7970m uses less power and is at least twice as powerful? If they want a low power chip going for a low end desktop GPU is stupid when the low power low heat mobile GPUs exist.
Model | Launch | Code name | Transistors (Million) | Memory (MiB) | Clock rate | Config core | Fillrate | Fillrate | Memory | Memory | Memory | GFLOPS | TDP3 (W) |
Pixel (GP/s) | Texture (GT/s) | Bandwidth (GB/s) | type | Bus width (bit) | |||||||||
Radeon HD 7950M | Q4 2011[98] | Thames Pro[79] | 2048 | 700 | 1409:28:32 | 24.3 | 71.7 | 155 | GDDR5 | 256 | 1749 | 50 | |
Radeon HD 7970M | Q4 2011[98] | Thames XT[79] | 2048 | 800 | 1537:36:32 | 28.7 | 87.4 | 172 | GDDR5 | 256 | 2017 | 65 | |
Radeon HD 6670 | 4/19/2011 | Turks | 716 | 512/1024 | 800 | 480:24:08 | 6.4 | 19.2 | 64 | GDDR5 | 128 | 768 | 66 |
Xenos (Xbox 360) | 11/22/2005 | R500, C1 | 232 | 512 (shared) 10 eDRAM | 500 | 48:16:08 | 4 | 8 | 22.4 (256EDRAM) | GDDR3 | 128 | 240 |
@TheVoxelman on twitter