pezus said:
|
My argument has some truth in it yet it's bogus? This isn't some unknown factor like RROD, it's just basic maths. 360 has been selling software at a faster rate because it has always been ahead in hardware sales. Bigger base = more people buying games each year. It's not until PS3 catches 360 (if it does) that it can start catching up on the software side. This is no speculation factor, if you think it is then you didn't get what I was saying. I'll try to think of a better analogy or try to word it better later tonight if so, but I must go now so I can't do it quite yet
|
Ugh you so did not get my point so I will be simple and direct.
This is my point: The best way to look at this is simply by the tie ratios...nothing more nothing less.
|
I got your point but that's your opinion...nothing more nothing less. Hardly a point, but rather a statement. You still keep walking around what I said and just repeat the same thing over and over again
|
>_>
Your argument quite a few variables in it hence making it speculation (certainly not bad speculation either...I just don't think that's the best way of looking at it). Actually when I think about it the absolute best way to look at software if you want to see which sold more is to align the launches.
