EncodedNybble said:
Your point being that an increase of 70 million systems accounted for 3 million more "core" gamers for the Wii while an increase of 35 million systems accounted for 3 million more "core" gamers for the 360 (though I think that number is way more explained by my previous post), thus meaning that the pecentage of "core" gamers with a 360 is at least twice that of "core" gamers with a Wii? |
My point is:
The relative percentage of casual/core increase ratio is entirely irrelevant to my original issue with Seece's very first post.
A decrease in traditional core gamer on Nintendo's consoles would've been relevant, but that didn't happen. :S
What would also seem relevant is a drastic increase in MS traditional core gamers compared to Nintendo traditional core gamers, but that hasn't happened either...
Hence, by his own logic, Seece would be right to say:
"Majority of gamers arnt even interested in Microsoft home consoles .." In other words, his post of "Majority of gamers arnt even interested in Nintendo home consoles .." was not only useless, but it was misleading.
