oniyide said:
Wyrdness said:
oniyide said:
Araknie said:
If you don't see a why to the Wii success you are one of the many think that only exclusives that sells can enter in good games party.
It's the same as it was for the PS2, there's more under the "what they want to let you believe" part.
I am concerned about why, for the Wii, nobody wants to realize that. |
Not sure what you're trying to say, but the PS2 was not the same as Wii, PS2 got 3rd party support coming out of its ass. ANd it moved quite a bit of hardware. PS2 versions of mulitplats almost always outsold the others. THe wii was the opposite which is strange for a lead console. Not saying that the Wii wasnt a success, but it wasnt dominating like PS2
|
Third party was alot different back then though almost all of the major third parties had some sort of exclusive title on the PS2, the was no DMC, FF etc... on any other console that's a big factor in its success, today how ever third parties have to be multiplatform as the cost of development forces it.
|
Well there you go... probably the main reason why Wii was never going to pull a PS2. Even if it got some of the games that the HDs got (Portal2, DMC4, RE5), the version would have been so chopped up that most people would opt for the HD/PC version anyway, just like they do now.
|
Portal 2, ok...but, DMC4 and RE5? Are these good games anyways?
I'm talking about good gameplay, i don't care about HD if those games are not gonna last more than 10 hours with copy/paste things from other games making them look all the same.
I mean that in the reference by Wii/PS2, they have both introduced new standards in gameplay genres.
