| jasongw said: They could get away with using a Cell revision with more cores and SPU's, I'd think. When Cell launched, it was a problem because nobody knew anything about the architecture and Sony was ridiculously slow at providing proper documentation in English. If a Cell with more cores operates in mostly the same way as the existing cell, then it's a fairly straightforward matter to develop for. GPU, I think, is the biggest problem. PS3's GPU is among the last of a previous generation of GPU's that operate very differently from the current generation. It may present some problems with backward compatibility for PS4. Hard to say for sure, though. As for RAM, they could probably do fine with DDR5, and because it's cheaper than XDR, much less XDR2, they could also afford to put more of it in. I realize many claimed that RAM speed would make up for lack of quantity, but, as a number of games have shown us on PS3, where they're inferior to their 360 counterparts, that simply isn't true. |
I wouldm'y have thought that a modern unified programmable pipeline GPU would have much trouble emulating an older GPU, a unified shader should in theory be able to do anything a vertex or pixel shader can. The GPU in the PS3 is basically off the shelf as far as I know so no fancy "smart" EDRAM or anything exotic in the architecture like the 360 does. Not like the PS2's custom GPU and CPU architecture. Tho it's not directly compairableas the GPU would be programed "direct to metal" in the PS3, but all DX10/11 GPUs maintain DX9 compatability even tho unified shaders were a DX10 feature. I guess they could be doing that at the driver/API level, but then couldn't Sony just implement an API for backwards compatability mode that does the same? Anyway I am just thinking out loud.
I hope you stick arround, it would be good to have someone who actually knows about this stuff arround.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
