By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mesoteto on 22 January 2008
Edit Thread
Dno said:

mesoteto said:
These are all response by Dno in regards to my point of the wii setting the price for the current gen

"actually no its not because it has not dropped the price at all. wii is controlling the market not the price."

"i dont think microsoft and sony are trying to be lower then the wii.... i think they are trying to hit mass market price..... why because 400-600 is a lot of cash. i think sony is trying to get to 299 faster then 360 NOT wii."

"if wii is mass market price then my car was WAY OVER PRICED. i think (and i think everyone will aggree with me) we would all pay a little more for a ps3 then a wii because it does WAY more. If sony wanted to match nintedo then the ps3 would be 249.99 and they would lose on 150 bucks on each system sold and thats way less then they lost before in 2006 when the system dropped. obviously thats NOT their goal."


so you keep switching and still unable to address why the wii did not set the price point for the current gen at 250

"the wii has something that cannot be stopped and sony has to lower the price to counter them"



i never switched when did i switch?  i said i do not think sony wants to match the wii in price thats what i said did i not..... do you read?

i always said the mass market price for everything is different and i do not think sony wants 250. i dont think im changing at all i think both of you are.

and im not mad in fact i enjoy a little debate but i dont agree with you two at all


Due first you make it sound like the 360/ps3 are not competing with Nintendo in the price game---then you make it sound like they are in their own price game—then you make it sound like sony is directly against Nintendo  And the whole time you still say Nintendo did not set the mass market price point for this gen---make up your mind