Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
Veemer was a smaller device. Heck, I think even transportable. Veemer was able to use the "Physics" more realistically. This video that you showed us only interacts with a limited umount of "Physics". Like a raindrop just falling appart, and a bouncing ballgoing in just one direction. While the veemer was able to recreate a collapse of a number of holographic cubes stacked together. Even able to interact with fingers and not just one surface like the one you showed on the video.
See the difference? |
I'm sorry about being direct but you have no idea what you're talking about. No way in the world is Veemer transportable or even smaller. You do understand what's under the table, don't you? It's a mirror spinning super fast reflecting light from a super high quality custom projector. Physics on the other hand is at least a valid statement but again pointless. You are saying because one system has better computer plugged up into it it's better? So if we are comparing two monitors the different computers running them should affect which screen is better? Along with this the user of the Veemer does not feel anything upon touching the image while the video I posted has tactile feed back. The sad part is the video I posted is itself lame within the world of 3D displays.







