Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 on 09 January 2012
| JoeTheBro said: I'm sorry but this is really, really lame. All they did was take pre-existing tech and added a kinect senser to track motion. Back in 2009 this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-P1zZAcPuw was demonstrated showing an even better version of this, just without a volumetric 3D display for 360 degree viewing. Also my last comment is this isn't a hologram! Stop in-correctly using hologram to describe sans glasses 3d displays! |
Veemer was a smaller device. Heck, I think even transportable. Veemer was able to use the "Physics" more realistically. This video that you showed us only interacts with a limited umount of "Physics". Like a raindrop just falling appart, and a bouncing ballgoing in just one direction. While the veemer was able to recreate a collapse of a number of holographic cubes stacked together. Even able to interact with fingers and not just one surface like the one you showed on the video.
See the difference?
Yay!!!
