Dno on 22 January 2008
| mesoteto said: @tk1989--i like how some people will use other systems to try and proove their shifting logic, but when asked to be proven wrong have to limit others i agree with your price point--if i have to similar items on a shelf and one has had the price dropped multiple time and the other is still just steamrolling along i am going to wonder why the company is cutting price so much--is something efective, less then, or wanting about said product also good point about people buying the system just for the blu ry--sony has commericals/ads just for this feature and dont even mention the fact it is a game machine "why would someone who wants just games spend extra money on something they will not use?), " thank you i am not alone here also good point about the ps2 start b/c of price---the wii didnt suffer from that as much b/c people are more comfortable spending the 250 mark now--and if i remember for a while the gamecube and ps2 were pretty close in price wernt they? |
yea ps3 (600) and wii (250) is much different then GCN( 200) and (ps2) 299 thats very true. we all made good points but the point i am trying to make is the the customer is looking for value. not always the cheapest price. and ps2 with online, DVD and ps3 with blu-ray and online and etc. is vaule. i no when i justify buying a ps3 it better have games and movies and thats what some not all look at.
not everyone wants a system that only plays games lol.
