By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BasilZero said:
spurgeonryan said:
BasilZero said:
Kinda neutral on this, abit on the self defense, its a tool that can be used for it, but at the same time can be used for mass destruction and chaos. Which is why I'm neutral on this matter.

As for some laughs, we'll need them guns when the Zombie Apocalypse arrives.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=138471&page=1#


What about some sort of gas? Wouldn't tear gas, nerve gas, etc still take out a zombie?

 

I think a small handgun would be good for safety. Very low caliber in houses. If you want to hunt then you need a hunter safety certificate, and   yearly hunting license. Then you can have a few weapons. But does everyone need 50 weapons!

Not sure , I doubt zombies would be effected o.o, they might be taken out for a few seconds but nothing as drastic as the effect on humans ;o.

As for small handgun, I do agree with that for being for safety, but ya having a load of different guns especially high end guns is a bit too much imo.

I'm starting to sound like a pedagogue here at the risk of annoying even myself.

No small handguns for personal safety. Any low caliber pocket pistol is better for mugging someone than defending oneself. Personally, I can't stand cheap pistols or any "mouse caliber" pistol supposedly designed for personal defense. 

Unless it's explicitly for precision target shooting at the range, nothing less than 9mm should ever be considered for "safety" or personal defense. And even then diligent training and the accuracy it fosters trumps any caliber you can choose.