Wyrdness said:
Jumpin said:
Wyrdness said:
I'm not religious but Evolution although logical is still a theory and not an absolute fact so the's no real reason why they should accept it tbh. |
You are describing a hunch theory, not a scientific theorem - a scientific theorem is an equation of scientific facts which has to be proven via the scienfific process. whereas a hunch theory is simply just a gut feeling (informed or uninformed) - two different things.
The theory of evolution (for example) does utilize the fact that creatures evolve, the fact of natural selection, the fact of sexual selection, the fact of genetic drift, the fact of maco and micro mutations, etc....
|
It's not an absolute fact though
|
Well it can't be because it is a theorem. It is like saying 2 + 3 = 5 isn't true because it is an equation rather than a number.
Let me put it to you this way, a scientific theory is uses a collection of scientific facts and laws organized in order to explain an observation or process - or another fact or collection of facts. So the theory of evolution is not a scientific fact because of its nature; but I'll put it this way in terms of the word "fact" that you are using as in "something that is proven true" - Evolution is a fact.
