miz1q2w3e said:
SWORDF1SH said:
pezus said:
miz1q2w3e said:
Play4Fun said:
Having hardware more powerful than your previous hardware isn't innovation.
Xbox Live is the only one of the three that you listed I would classify as innovation for gaming on the level of Wii's controller.
|
This
|
We weren't talking about "levels of innovation" though. Wii's controller is arguably more innovative than Blu-Ray, sure, but both are still innovative. I'm going to leave it at that because I know that no matter what I say, you two will never agree about this. I'm out!
|
Please stop acting like nintendo inovates
Yes they have been in gaming longer than ms and sony but they werent the first.
yes they did have the most sucess with motion controls but they wasnt first
Sony is one of the most inovitive company ever get over it
http://www.kaizenbits.com/?attachment_id=705
|
Except no one was arguing that Sony doesn't innovate at all, just that existing technology getting better over time shouldn't be counted as innovation >_>
Besides that, most of the things in the list you keep posting aren't all that innovative, AND the vast majority have nothing to do with gaming
|
Im just fed up with people sayin sony copy and the nintendo are awesome. Sony have history of inovating and will continue to do so. you can still use existing tech and inovate. Move is an inpvation of wii and wii is an inovation of ps eye and im sure pseye inovated from something else.