By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SWORDF1SH on 05 January 2012
Edit Thread
NintendoPie said:
SWORDF1SH said:
NintendoPie said:
SWORDF1SH said:
NintendoPie said:
SWORDF1SH said:
NintendoPie said:
It has to be Sony, with the Vita so far not doing good and Microsoft/Nintendo having great sales (even though Sony did good this year.) Sony doesn't even really develop their own games and they seem to think they can price their consoles at the highest of prices. It would be sad to see Sony go though, I would rather it be Microsoft. (gaming wise.)


lol WHAT!?

Vita doing bad?? Sorry but to weeks in and not launched in Europe and US how the hell do you know. Look at the launch line up, its western orientated. Vita selling ok in japan, not great but ok and until there a final fantasy, monster hunter etc it will sell ok for now

 

And dont get me started on sony doesnt develop its own games. Just lack of really gaming knoledge i guess

Yup I'm just stupid.... I just say random things and don't know anything I'm talking about whatesoever..... really?!

   The Vita is doing bad, it's not 'ridiculous' bad but it's bad. It released in a Holiday season and sold less than the 3DS in it's first week, and the 3DS wasn't even sold at a time in the Holidays and it had barely any games! Plus the second week dropped a lot! And their are still games targeted to Japan. (Dynasty Warriors, HotShots Golf, etc.) Anyway, Sony has like what? Maybe a few Sony made games? So please don't say I don't know what I'm talking about when clearly I do know. (just look at the data.)

What are you talking about

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCE_Worldwide_Studios

and if youre comparing to 3ds then it did nowhere as good but the 3ds as got monster hunter, marioland 3ds and mariokart 3ds. 3 massive games. Sony shipped only 500k so thats the figures they were expecting. wait for it to launch ww and give it a year. can you remember the 3ds doom articles.


What I read from that article they "added" all company's who made games but didn't make them themselves.

I am comparing it to the 3DS (only other 7th gen. handheld.) And the 3DS didn't have those games at launch (bolded.) I was talking about the recent months. Yeah I remember those articles I guess we do have to wait. Still Sony put way too much into this console just like they did for the PS3 with it's cell graphics precessor and other "shiny new expensive things" and they thought they could price it at $600 and looked what that did for it. :/ Heck look how the 3DS did after it's first few weeks of selling ok and then selling worse and worse because of lack of good games and $250 price tag.


So you didnt see the part about 16 studios god youre hard work. list of games from sony this gen

112 ps3 game

http://www.vgchartz.com/worldtotals.php?name=&publisher=300&console=PS3&genre=&minSales=0&results=50&sort=Total

144 psp games

http://www.vgchartz.com/worldtotals.php?name=&publisher=300&console=PSP&genre=&minSales=0&results=50&sort=Total

the search thing is a little crap but you get the picture.


 Yeah 16 studios that they added to their company that are making games for them.

they are owned by sony. Doesnt matter how. Your comment about sony not developing its own games shows lack of knoledge when sony own the most 1st party game developers and probably sony own the most ips and created the most new ips this gen