Khuutra said:
oniyide said:
I want them to go balls out and have a different setting, I mean DIFFERENT, there were some pics online about what a Zelda would look like in modern day type setting. I thought it looked bad ass personally. I know "but then it would be just like an open world game" nothing wrong with that. Batman went open world and all the better for it. At least try it, they can always go back to fantasy esqe setting.
How about you let me USE Zelda, it could dramatically change the gameplay and make it more interesting. Maybe do an Arkham City type thing and have a playable for a small portion, see how that fits. |
The structure of the game is one of the things that I thought Arkham Asylum did better than Arkham City. The sense of progression was a lot more apparent in Asylum, since it was basically Metroid with Batman in it and you gained access to huge swathes of new areas according to the growth of your abilities. When you make the game open-world you also necessarily remove a sense of accomplishment associated with seeing new parts of it, and I don't know if that would be a good thing in Zelda.
|
I see where you are coming from. BUt i dont agree, i thought that Arkham City was more grander, Yeah I get Asylum was Metroid but IMHO I get bored with that formula a bit. My sense of progression was never in question with City. Might just be you. I always thought Zelda was kinda openworld anyway, they could just take the GTA/INFAMOUS/Bully approach and have the world open up as you progress. Hell they can keep doing what there doing just change the setting, replace the town with a city and dungeons with.. whatever equvilant woud be.
