chris.m95 said:
1st point: So an animal isnt as important as a human and killing an animal isnt murder, am i getting this right? 2nd point: The UK does import many goods as you suggested but to kill animals to stop what you call an infestation? By doing that arent you playing god? My opinion is that there is no "infestation" just an eco system that you seem to be trying to claim for yourselves which in my opinion is selfish. 3rd point: Animals "decimate the landscape" you know if you want to protect crops you can put up fences maybe those with a small eletric current to stop them getting in? In that sense you arguement for what i believe is poinless killing is flawed as you can protect land with fences. 4th point: I apologiese for bringing the nazis into this i went too far but too me it seems that way, killing for the point of killing 5th point: No youve pissed off someone who deosnt find it easy to justify killing the way you do. There you go. no putting words in your mouth, actual quotesfrom your arguements, an apology, my points of view nothing more. |
You're right. Killing an animal for food is not murder. Murder is, by definition: a crime of killing somebody: the crime of killing another person deliberately and not in self-defense or with any other extenuating circumstance recognized by law, or Murder is the unlawful killing, with malice aforethought, of another human being.
Notice how those definitions say human being, and person. Not animals. I live in the real world. In the real world, humans are at the top of the food chain. If that makes us playing God, then so be it. Maybe God shouldn't have given us this incredible advantage over other species then? Go talk to him about that. Even if you're a vegan, all the products you eat were made possible by killing thousands and millions of smaller creatures, you know the kind that get crushed by the farming equipment as it goes through the fields?
And while we are on it. Go sue the lions and cheetas who brutally run down their prey, stab it multiple times, and rip its throat out as it wiggles and dies slowly... you know, much worse than an instant kill shot through the heart. That's murder by your definition right? And they don't need to eat just like we don't need to eat right?
So you would have most of the world go hungry then? You want most of the billions of people on this planet to die? Some humanitarian you are. Join PETA dude. They seem right up your alley. The only reason you eat what you do is because of the practices that humans do in regards to farm land and hunting.
Fences? They already do that. Doesn't stop much, not to mention, if they can't afford fences to stop illegal immigrants, what makes you think they could do it to guard all the land we use for farming? But forget about being practical that way. Small electrical current? You want to pay for that? You want to install that? And small current? Small like those invisible fences for dogs? That I've seen dogs run right through when a cat runs across the street? Or enough to kill the animal dead and stop it's heart. Otherwise, fences aren't stopping anything, definitely not anything hungry, nevermind the smaller animals who will just dig underneath it.
You justify killing by eating the food you do, you just don't know it. It's called being at the top of the food chain. Welcome to humanity.
BOOM! FACE KICK!