Areym said:
sales2099 said:
LivingMetal said:
sales2099 said:
LivingMetal said:
sales2099 said:
Statistical tie!
I dont think anybody expected 360 to evaporate PS3s hard work catching up, while at the same time keeping relevant despite PS3s 2011 exclusives! |
Not very relevant from a gamer's perspective. As long as Microsoft primarily caters to the masses and the casuals/non-gamers (shooters and Kinect), it's no surprise that sales have risen as they have during the most hyped shopping time of the year. From a sales and investor's perspective, the Xbox 360 sales nubers are relevant. You target the biggest audience, you garnish the biggest sales. But too bad they did not invest their resources in more 1st/2nd party games such as platformers, action adventures, and survival horror. If they did and these titles were of considerable quality, the Xbox 360 would become more relevant as a hardcore gaming console. In fact, the PS3 is more relevant and its sales are more impressive because Sony continues to cater to the gamers by their 2011 exclusives.
|
360 was very relevant from a gamers perspective.
You do realize that 90% of 360's and PS3 library is the same. And when you see great multiplats like Assassins Creed, Battlefield 3, Modern Warfare 3, Skyrim, Bulletstorm, Frontline, Brink.....I could go on.......sell much better on 360. MS naturally has every reason to invest into kinect cause they allready have the core gamers on their side. MS's exclusives, while fewer in number, have more real world relevance then PS3 more numerous, yet culturally irrelevant by comparison, exclusives.
On the internet most of us have the "exclusive complex". You also hear "exclusive whore" or "exclusive nuts". They really don't make a difference unless the people care about them. Flagship wise, Sony has GOW, Uncharted, and GT. The rest don't have public brand recognition. Really, in the end, gamers go for the multiplats as again they are the bulk of the library.
And to me, given PS2 domination last gen, no amount of how good PS3 is selling can be considered "impressive".
|
Doesn't matter. For instance, Dark Souls and Skyrim are both on the PS3 and Xbox 360 both are action Western style RPG's, but Dark Souls sold far better on the PS3 while Skyrim sold far better on the Xbox 360. It's the target audience of the console and the mentality of the buyers. Both PS3 and Xbox 360 sales are impressive. But Sony continues to cater primarily to the core and hardcore games while Microsoft continues to primarily cater to the casual/non-gamers when you look at their exclusive content. As a hardcore gamer, the PS3 is far more relevant because of Sony's offerings plus 3rd party offerings as opposed to the Xbox 360 because of who they are catering to. And again, the 90% figure you tout also mean very little in the real wotld when all consoles have their more than fair share of shovelware.
|
So you think PS3 caters to you more as a core gamer, thats fine and all. But dont confuse your opinion with those of the masses. You really see where the core gamers go judging on the sales of our most big name multiplats. PS3 has multiplats selling in its favor......but far more are simply preferred on 360.
360 is the core gamers console of choice as it is the emerging mass market console as well.
|
I have a problem with that statement cause when you say "360 is the core games console of choice", the first imagine in my mind is FPS. That's all I can think of and I'm sure there is more to core gaming than locking in 100 hours on MW3. I assume however, that you are talking sales wise since multiplatform games sell better on the 360 (skyrim, bulletstorm, etc)
OffT:I don't know, I think MW3 just ruined the concept of core gaming FOR ME. I don't play FPSs aside from resistance (not even the online) so my gamer friends and I usually get into debates about true core gaming. Weirdly enough, most MW players understand my dislike of the game.
OnT: This debate is silly. That is all.
|
Essay Pro