LordTheNightKnight said:
oniyide said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
"Im not talking about before im talking about now, where do you see people NOW, especially people at your age talk about games as much as they do online, and I was referring to the internet as a whole not really message boards"
Well you did specifically mention message board dwellers in another post. But even if the internet is the choice discussion place now, it still represents fans better than reviews do.
"the game is sitting on a 94 on Metacritic"
Again, when? When did those reviews come out? Launch? Beta? Alpha?
As for sales, the game sold well over a million (and I think almost four million) before even the official release. |
The reviews are from the past four weeks, but I dont know what that has to do with anything. and where are you getting the sales from??
|
When some people other gaming sits discussed the game, they brought up how well it sold. So it sold before any reviews even happened.
And how, when I've been stating that reviews don't decide if a game is good, would that not have to do with my point? Since those reviews came well after gamers decided the game was good, the gamer did the deciding.
|
Link to sales?? So they were charging for a beta before the full game was out?? Im not asking to be an ass, im asking because that seems strange to me. Ive never heard of a game that was being sold while it was still in beta.
Are reviewers not gamers too?? All they did was agree with what people were generally saying about the game anyway. Dont see how the two are different, except the reviewers put numbers on it.
