Entroper on 21 January 2008
| kn said: How about a meaningful ban. Leo-j has been warned repeatedly about all sorts of things. 300 posts in such a short period should have been something way more serious than a 1 day ban... more like a month this time. What was this -- his 3rd or 4th ban? Clearly it doesn't work. If he comes in on a second account and gets caught, permanent... |
I agree that we need more severe punishments for repeated offenders. If someone is banned for 1 day or 3 days, it really doesn't affect them enough to be a deterrent. I've never banned anyone on Seriously for less than a week.
Another thing to note is that leo-j and Brute were both banned for spamming, and earned fines of 100 vg$ or less, but each "earned" over 300 vg$ by spamming. So their spamming was still a profitable enterprise, and I think that should be corrected.
