| Andrespetmonkey said: Cod4 - Campaign was brilliantly paced and not so over the top - so the "oh shit" moments were special, and pretty original. It also made sense and russains in the middle east wasn't done to death at the time. Cod5 also had by far the best WW2 campaign I've ever played and showed the pacific side of the war really well. I think I might even like that campaign more than cod4s. Also, Nazi zombies. |
@ Bolded
You put it perfectly, MW2 felt quite similar to COD4 in the campaign too even if the story became convoluted, MW3 feels like a Michael Bay movie.
I also liked COD5 but it lacked something the Modern Warfare game had, especially in the multiplayer. Zombies was a great idea though, absolutely brilliant mini game.
Campaign: COD4 > MW2 = COD5 > MW3
Online: COD4 > MW2 >>> COD5 = MW3
At first I thought MW3 was pretty great and almost as good as the other Modern Warfare games, then I realised how shitty the story was and how over the top the campaign was. I realised how bland the Spec Ops was and even though Survival is pretty good it is nowhere near as fun or original as Nazi Zombies, and lastly I realised how broken the online was. Maps are boring and poorly designed, weapons feel samey and they aren't as diverse as they were in the other COD games, the game has unexplained lag spikes making it almost unplayable and I don't know if this is just XBL or not but I'm sick to death of people abusing weaknesses in the games' balance. Don't even get me started on the campers.
