By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Marks on 22 November 2011
Edit Thread
mantlepiecek said:
Marks said:

Also a side note:

I literally LMAO at anyone who used the single player as a reason they don't like CoD such as "Oh it has a boring short campaign", "it has a shit story...russians this, russians that", "its the same campaign every year"....etc..etc..etc

Anyone with half a brain knows multiplayer is all that matters in CoD. I've owned the game since Day 1 and haven't even looked at the single player. I've done 1 or 2 games of Spec Ops survival, and the rest of my play time is online.

If you want a good single player go play Skyrim, Skyward Sword or Uncharted 3. Those are all games that are actually built around single player experience. 

That's funny. I have been playing call of duty since mordern warfare, and modern warfare 2 was exactly the same. Exact. There were like some differences in killstreaks. And some weapon differences. Other than that, everything, the setting, gameplay, graphics, story (LOL) everything was same. Taking other games as example Uncharted single player has changed its setting with every entry, gears of war has improved its gameplay with sequels, battlefield has definitely improved its graphics with its sequel, skyrim, etc need I say more? Its call of duty's fault it is released every year to have changes as big as other games. Even then it hasn't changed much since modern warfare. That's just shameful.

I liked call of duty too, world at war is my favorite one.Oh, and the campaign in both modern warfare and world at war were pretty good, so if you are saying we shouldn't consider these games' single player experience into consideration, then you are wrong.


You think Call of Duty 4 and MW2 were the same? The graphics were a big improvement, all new perks plus pro perks, tons more killstreaks, new game modes (demolition, cap the flag, and a couple variations of older modes), host migration ability, more weapons, more attachments, the list goes on.

I'm not saying all of the above are good things, all I'm saying is you can't possibly think they were the exact same. If you were going to say any two CoD games are the same your best bet would be comparing MW3 and MW2. They are the most similar IMO. 

I don't know how much Call of Duty you've played in your life but if you actually play a lot you'd know every CoD plays differently online. In the beginning I tried to play MW3 the same way I played MW2 (and had a 3.00 k/d ratio) and the best I could get was a 1.70 k/d. Not that I really care about stats (besides winning) but it goes to show you can't play every CoD game the same way, you have to adapt.