padib said:
It doesn't need to be space marines, it could be Samus that's not the point oni. What I mean is that Nintendo sucks at making their games credible and interesting ala hollywood. Sony can, Microsoft can, they can't. That's the point. And I demand that they hire contractors who can do it for them, and maybe even hopefully teach them the ways of success in that area of weakness. The only thing going for them atm in my eyes is the orchestras they hired for Galaxy and SS. Other than that, they are not staying culturally relevant. They are certainly fun, but not relevant. Zelda = Shadow of the Colossus, Dark Cloud, Ico. Granted not the same, but close enough. NSMB = Little Big Planet. => See, at least Sony tried! Wii Sports = Kinect Sports => Microsoft tried! Why can't Nintendo try?? What you're all failing to see is that Nintendo is a game maker, yes, but they are also even more importantly a console manufacturer, they need to cater to the broadest audience possible in order to ensure brand success. Sadly some of you more being interested in your favored games fail to see the business side of it. |
woah buddy! you're right, a console maker should make ALL games, and i agree about Samus, i think its strange that there was 3 Metroid Prime games and none of them had any sort of multiplayer, this could have been Ninty's KZ, or at the least Resistance. It would have keep selling if it had it, Uncharted got a compotent online 2nd game out, hell they made a multiplayer focused Metroid for DS of all systems but whatever. Here's my thing and you're not gonna like it, I and im sure a few others dont CARE if Ninty makes these games or not. Im a multiplat owner. PS3/Wii Sony covers me on the games you are talking about, so the truth of the matter is it doesnt bother me at all if Ninty never makes games like that
