mjk45 said:
Would I be right in assuming that these MW3 deals cost MS a fair bit of money and that a higher proportion than usual are sold to people who are already 360 owners ,and Sony spreads theirs out more and tends to use theirs to promote their exclusives and gets benefit year round where as Ms spends up at the peak buying time to gain ground, also being the start to the holiday season and MW3 being a blockbuster is the real impact positive as it is , clouded. |
Unless MS are marketing wizards (which they might be) then yes the MW3 deals would have cost them money. Activision has no need to favour MS and would certainly have made them pay for the advertising favouritism while retailers/Activision would almost certainly have got MS to vendor fund bundles.
I suspect a fair number of the MW3 bundles went to existing 360 owners. Not all but a decent amount. This is normal for special editions which target existing fans. Given Sony do this well in Japan I'm always amazed then seem somewhat flumoxed in West about doing the same thing. But kudos to MS for good targeting of special edition bundles in West.
I think both spend all year round but I do feel there is a situation where Sony spends a bit more all year round and MS focuses more on certain time periods. Given MS main install base is countries with big seasonal spikes in demand this makes sense whereas Sony at the moment has a more spread install base for PS3 geographically and tends to lean towards more regular advertising to maintain brand visibility.
Overall I think MS advertises better than Sony in the West,particularly in the US, although both do a good job overall I guess.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...