sales2099 said:
"It's US and US alone. Without it MS would never have taken the lead... See, this kind of argument is essentially meaningless when used with bias." You see at least Sony has a decent presence in NA where as 360 doesn't even come close in Japan. You point would have merit if PS3 sold as much as 360 does in Japan. |
Again it doesn't work like that. My point has 100% merit because it's how logic works. The 360 is more popular in some countries, PS3 is others. Therefore you cannot claim any special "if only this" for one of the consoles. Claiming if only the countries that preferred PS3 gave 360 more of a chance is automatically the same as asking for countries that favour the 360 to give the PS3 more of a chance.
The percentage difference in preference is irrelevant in such a condition - you can't say because Japan favours PS3 a bit more than US favours 360 that's different. That just affects the extent to which they'd have to adjust their preference, not the basic fact they would.
Look, I was just calling out your statement was one way when the same logic applies to both and that is the case no matter how you try and argue it isn't so let's leave it there.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...