By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
errorpwns on 16 November 2011
Edit Thread
pezus said:
miz1q2w3e said:
pezus said:
Naum said:
strange they complain about "more of the same" and gives it a 7.5 but they at the same time can give other games(that have had 3-4 releases in as many years) that is just "more of the same" 10.0 or 9.8 etc etc

You're misguided. Looks like you're just complaining to complain because everybody is doing it. What you said is not true at all.

What are you talking now? you're not making sense any more

He has a valid point, a lot of games have had a ton of sequels in a much shorter time with A LOT less changes getting very high scores. Are youseriously trying to deny it?

You can leave now and take you're BS/lies elsewhere tyvm

Please stop with the overreaction. I'm not BS-ing or lying, check Gamespot if you want. Point me at the yearly rehashes that get 10's and 9.8's on GS...
It just looks like he doesn't visit gamespot very often, because then he'd know they don't rate games on a 100 points scale.

Not a 9.8, but look  http://www.gamespot.com/gears-of-war-3/reviews/6334586/gears-of-war-3-review 

also

http://www.gamespot.com/gears-of-war-2 9

COD and its rehashes got 8.5-9s 

If the reviewer actually knew how to use the motion controls, this game would of gotten a 9 probably.  The problem with the reviewer is, from his attitude he went into his review to purposely seek out the negatives in the game, with barely looking for anything positive.  He didn't play the game right he didn't put any effort forth to try and get the motion controls right.  He shouldn't of reviewed this game at all if he didn't even put any effort to play it correctly.