Boutros said:
I don't really like the way gamerankings aggretates reviews. Metacritic stops adding reviews for a game after a certain period whilst gamerankings keeps on adding them. I find Metacritic's way more accurate as it gives a better idea of how the game was received when it came out. For example someone gave the game 6/10 in 2009 and it was added on gamerankings but not on metacritic. I don't think someone from 2009 can judge the game as accurately. |
I'm seeing Link To The Past as being around 92%.
All credibility is lost.







