Digital Foundry vs. Uncharted 3

[zarx]

osamanobama said:
did anyone else feel like they barely went into any depth about the technically aspects of the game, rather they were just defending the score that eurogamer gave it.
they didnt really touch on the tech at all, they didnt mention its resolution (though we already know its 720p)
didnt mention what kind of AA it has, little to no mention of its frame rate.
What about the huge improvement to the lighting, any insight on that tech at all... any?
what about the input lag for the controller, they complained about the aiming (doesnt seem different to me form U2) but make no analysis of it.
i thought this was a rather disapointing "tech analysis", it seemed as if all this was was a follow up to the review, complaining a little about the gameplay, and vague praise of its technical prowess, saying statement such as no other games can do graphically what Uncharted does, though with no detail.
and whats funny about the example they gave for bad gameplay, where in one section if you drop down you grap a lower edge, and another you fall to your death, is that the place where you grab the edge, you can see that its straight down from where youre hanging, and the place where you fall to your death, the lower edge is in, meaning the top is an overhang. So it makes sense that you would die, as you dont drop down directly on it.

They said that there were no major tech changes from 2, so they obviously didn't feel like retreading old ground and focused on the new stuff, including screens of the "new" lighting effects (and noting it's the same system from 2). As for the framerate there is a frame counter in the top left of every video. 

tho mentioning characters and story is a tad out of place but not unhread of in such articles from the site.