By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake said:
Player1x3 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Player1x3 said:

I'd say let them do whatever they want with their money. It is insane how arrogant western countries are, thinking they can manipulate people into changing their laws, just because they think theirs are so superior. Also, let the african children starve to death and their family dies out with diseases, dick taking men will have their ''equal rights'' no matter what cost. If i ran one of those countries, I wouldn't neither expect nor accept their money, and sure as hell wouldn't be changing my laws without the voice of people

In other words you'd be a terrible leader (the rest of the comment indicates the same thing).


Nah, I just wouldn't spread my ass for any manipulating arrogant westerner with money which became quite the trend in my country's politics lately. I wouldn't change any laws while ignoring voice of people, especially for as something ridiculous as ''gay rights'' (marriage, adoption and shit) when there are other much more important rights people should take care about and consider, rather than having half naked men dancing with other almost naked men on their ''pride'' parade, in front of children and other people

So, in other words, you'd be a terrible leader. Well, not like the people in your country wouldn't deserve you.


By your definition, everyone that doesn't share your views is terrible, so that really doesn't matter much. Also, the people in my country are world champions when it come to choosing bad leaders XD . The only time we don't have a terrible leader,is when we didn't get to choose any lol :p