RolStoppable said:
Oh, I never said that I picked this option. I just said that I am against the other one. Hehehe. You've got something to explain, Khuutra. We can't leave it at that. |
Rol, you are normally a reasonable enough poster that I feel I can communicate anything I need to with effort.
I have spent considerable effort trying to communicate why the definite and universal identification of certain 2-D console-based Mario platformers as the "main" or "real" Marios is not ontologically valid, specifically as it relates to the dependency on the perspectives of other people. This is very much the point of the topic, it is the entire point on which all of this discussion hinges, but you insist I'm "missing the point". I find this frustrating, but acceptable, and am ready to chalk that up to an inability to communicate the point on my part. Fine, you know: whatever. My fault, probably.
I am not, on the other hand, of a mind to sit and take the tone on display here. I find that considerably more frustrating. Infuriating, really. I tried to talk to you about this because I thought I would communicate something that's important to the discussion here, in hopes of building mutual understanding and contribute to the culture of respect that this site has cultivated (on some level).
If that's not going to happen then I want no part of this.
