IGN - Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception Review!!!

[Michael-5]

pezus said:

Michael-5 said:

2. That' a stupid system to use. So if the score were 97, would it be rounded to 95/100? How come some games still get score of 94/100?

This actually supports my arguement, IGN's rating system is seriously flawed.

3. I played BF3 on my friends PC, it's fun, and I used to play a little BF2, so I have something to get it to. Bioshock multiplayer was decent, like UC3, GTAIV multiplayer, again decent.

I didn't want to include 360 exclusives to the debate, lets ignore all the above titles, you still agree Killzone and CoD multiplayer is better then UC3? Is it a big difference for you?

As for your IMDB comment, good call, guess that's like the user score on a website, or metacritic. Still IGN should make reviews which respresent them as a company. If an individual gives a game a 10/10, and they want that to represent the website as a whole, they should have othr people look over it. The individuals who review games at IGN seem to give 10/10 out too easily this gen.

That said, Uncharted 3 could be the most deserving title for 10/10, but then MGS4, SMG2, and GTAIV should not have gotten 10/10. There is only room for one pinnacle game every gen, it's hardly a pinnacle of gaming if one of these games come out every year.

This is my arguement, people need to stop attacking me for my view on Uncharted, and stop twisting my arguement to whatever they feel like. I say good and bad things about all games, and I will defend games which I feel are disrespected. If people talked about Uncharted the way they do about Forza 4, I would do the exact same thing (as soon as I play UC3) on this thead as I did the other.

Read the IGN review. It says the game is 8 hours long, and Uncharted 2 is 10 hours. "The game is give or take about 10 hours in length, which feels right.."-UC2 In the UC3 video review they say the game is 8 hours.

Wait your right, Portal 2 and Forza 4 got 9.5 on IGN, along with Mass Effect 2 (PS3). My mistake, got the websites mixed up, I admit when I'm wrong. However 94/100 for Forza 4 and 90/100 for Portal 2 are still fair scores. GT also gave GT5 a 90/100 where IGN gave it an 85/100.

osama your hilarious. You are show incredible bias. Only me? Maybe on this website, but it's not only me. This website also lacks people who own more then just a PS3. Look at the metascore, read the reviews, not everyone thinks so highly of UC3 multiplayer. The same goes with many franchises, but I honestly feel UC3 multiplayer is acked on. It reminds me of Resident Evil 5 Versus.

My whole arguement is no game should get 10/10, and IGN should really change their rating system if 9.5 is the highest legitimate score they can give. IGN is flawed, that's my arguement, stop twisting it around to be something else. I am also an Uncharted fan, so ignoring me, and forcing an image onto me.

If you want to just sit around mock me, go ahead, but you are not worth debating with if that's the path you choose. So far, that appears to be your goal. Accept other people have different opinions, and move on. If you want to debate with me, debate with the arguement I am presenting, stop making an arguement up yourself.

The 94 ratings you see on IGN are from when they were still using the old system. Nowadays they only rate with .0 and .5. 

IGN can't really predict the future, can they? Should they wait until the end of the gen and rate all the best games then and pick the best one to get a 10? That wouldn't work...

I'd say the multiplayer of Killzone and Call of Duty and UC3 is on about the same level. Call of Duty is getting old though, Uncharted feels fresh when you start to unlock all the good stuff and learn to traverse the environment quickly and efficiently.

Uncharted 2 wasn't really 10 hours though, it was closer to 8-9 for me so maybe UC3 will be just as long as UC2 for me? 

There new system is stupid. Do you agree? This is my arguement.

I know IGN can't predict the future, but they can't give every jaw dropping game they see a 10. They have to restrain themselves more. They didn't do this last gen, or any gen before, and there were plenty of near perfect titles back then too.

For length, UC2 took me 10.5 hours because I explored a bit. UC1 took like 6.5 hours or so, and those are about the times GT took. If they say it's shorter then UC2, I see no reason why we can't assume it isn't. If the same person took 10 hours to beat UC2 and took 8 to beat UC3, then maybe you will beat UC3 in 7 hours? I dunno.

8 hours is still good, and it's quality not quantitiy.

Don't hate me for saying this, but I'd rather have them fix the bugs in platforming, then make the game longer. Uncarted 2 wasn't as bad, but this one scene where you have to climb a pole and jump to a roof, UC2 would just not allow Drake to look at the other roof. Took me 10 minutes to get past that stupid glitch, and it happened more then once. However to be fair Naughty Dog does tackle more in gameplay then anyone else, and I really hope UC3 improves the climbing system by as much or more as they did from UC1 to UC2.