Sqrl said:
If his argument only has a "little truth" when we ONLY look at 3rd party then how good is his argument considering he fails to single out 3rd party? You're basically making exscuses for the argument. But as I said his argument is about how much time people spend playing games and neither you or I can seperate out how much time is spent on 1st vs 3rd party games so the "amount" of truth is indescernable in terms of 1st or 3rd part. What is descernable is that people play their Wii quite a bit according to Nintendo's own polls put out during E307. But more than that the article says that he thinks 3rd parties will leave the Wii "sooner rather than later". Which is of course ridiculous when the console has the lowest development cost and is poised to have an overwhelming lead in terms of sales by the time any game that is started now is released. We can try to find a "little truth" in each of his arguments but it doesn't make a bit of difference when his overall idea is way off base. Whether games deserve to flop or not does matter. I would be far more concerned if games like Boogie were doing well, and you would be complaining about that too if it had sold well. Now, what is your underlying point? Even if there were a "little truth" in his position, who cares? What does that matter? What does this "little truth" have in terms of impacting sales in your opinion? |
Maybe i was only stating where i believe he got his idea came from.
I only cared because i got into a arguement with 5 different people trying to defend my opinion
When i get called a troll because i prefer my 360 to a wii you know something is wrong
Owner of all consoles cept DS.....Currently in love with prototype!







