| richardhutnik said: Oh, let's see... calculate the number of people at the occupy event times the length of time and the amount of times a rape can break out when you have that many people in one spot that prolonged period of time. Is it that people were expecting there to be no crimes happening over that prolonged period of time, with that many people there? If you are opposed to Occupy, it would be best you hope it didn't happen, because Occupy would then be demonstrating itself as the solution to crime in cities, which it in no shape or form has even claimed to be. Anyhow, carry on. Definitely need the Occupy movement to turn into a narrowly driven agenda movement that excludes as many people as the Tea Party movement does, so that we can get even more polarizing and have it so that the country turns into a full blown Civil War everywhere, complete down to shooting amongst the people. Of course the only ones shooting will be either the government implementing a police state, or Tea Party folks yelling "Don't tread on me" as the engage in target practice against the Occupy folks. Now, that makes for a GREAT comedy: American Autumn, a play in 3 parts. Or, they all can just go home, leave Wall Street alone, continue to be at home without jobs (I guess they are too lazy to find any in this full employment utopia Obama brought people), and just STFU. Hey, just suck it down, and as Europe implodes, the Fed will bail them out to prop up the economy and flush extra cash into Wall Street to save the economy. But of course, who needs the extra help. I am sure some Tea Partiers with automated weapons can storm the Fed and take Ben B. hostage and say they will shoot him unless the madness stops. |
It's not that I'm surprised. When you have stupid young girls sleeping in tents with complete strangers, especially ones who are part of a morally suspect movement, rape is bound to occur. The fact that there is another "occupation" whose literature actually encourages its members not to take such matters to the police just seems emblematic of this whole stupid movement: a bunch of naive children screaming about how they could run the world so much better when, in reality, they know absolutely nothing. If I had a nickel for every time I've heard one of these geniuses ranting about how we'd all be so much better off if we could only eliminate money, I could bail out the banks again all by myself. (What would they get rid of next? Division of labor?)
You seem kind of distraught (then again, you usually do), so I really don't know how to respond to the rest of your womanish outburst. I'll only remind you that you were appalled by a few misspelled signs at the tea parties not so very long ago, but now you brush off this kind of abject insanity like it's nothing.
