By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
crissindahouse on 18 October 2011
Edit Thread
Michael-5 said:
crissindahouse said:
Michael-5 said:
Anyone who said yes clearly is not human, and a wolf.

Humans can only see 26 or 29FPS (I forget).

What you do see in 30 FPS videos is a dip in FPS. If FPS dips, even slightly, a human can see it.

So if you are playing a game on PC, and your PC can handle the game at 30FPS smoothly, you don't need to upgrade the FPS for better visuals. If your playing console, you should play 60FPS because the FPS dip in both cases, but at 60FPS our eyes are more tolerable (we won't notice a drop to 45 FPS unless there is screen tearing).

just like someone posted a link in this thread, this is wrong. if someone shows you 250 fps and only one of it has a picture you can say which it was. with the logic a human can only see ~25 fps ths wouldn't be possible. it's enough to show movies with only 24 fps to let you think these aren't only pictures but you can clearly see more than that

No... I took a university level chemistry course and this was on my exam. I remember being surprised because I thought humans could see 60FPS, but we can't.

For a video shown at 250FPS, you just have a 1 in 10 chance of seeing a particular frame.

sry but than your exam isn't worth anything. almost everybody does this wrong. there is a difference between seeing more than 25 fps or just to need 25 fps to see it as fluent movement.

read the link and you see it, they made a test with pilots of the airforce i think. they showed them 250 fps and only one pic had a information and they knew which. only every tenth could say it if you would be right.

 

Edit: they didn't show them 250 fps they showed them only one pic in 1/220 second. that clearly shows that a human can see an information in less than let's say 1/100 second and not only every fourth time like it should be possible if we only could see 25fps.