Tridrakious said:
That is what threw me with these statements from John Carmack. I haven't heard people complaining that the PS3 was having issues running the game, so to hear Carmack throw the PS3 under the bus (after praising the platform before the release [another odd thing as well]). My personal taste in gaming has not been effected by the release of RAGE. I don't have interest in it whatsoever. Something that pisses me off is when people just make damn blanket statements. I never thought I would actually agree with STAGE is shocking...how things change. |
Carmack didn't throw the PS3 under the bus he replied to a question about whether it was possible to make RAGE on PS3 better. He replied with the truth the PS3 is held back by limited RAM and poor IO performance are the issues and there is no real way arround these as they are hard limits and the assets are already compressed as much as possible. These are not opnions these are well documented facts and no matter how powerful on paper the CELL is it can't make Blu-Ray faster, allow a full install or reduce the size of the source textures without a negative impact on the graphics.
It's not like he hasn't criticised other platforms he has been vocal about DVD and lack of a standard HDD hurts the game on 360 and that PC is hamstrung by API overheads and a wide veriaty of hardware configurations. It's not like he is singling out any platform. He complements and has complaints about all platforms, yet only his PS3 complaints generate a backlash this big...
@TheVoxelman on twitter