By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. said:
worldlyfall said:
x_DMX_x said:
NotStan said:
x_DMX_x said:
Yup im totally going to believe this guy.This coming from the guy who claimed that "the PS3 verison of the game was easy to develop because of blu-ray platform it will be one of the dominant versions"Now he does this.Not only that but Microsoft pays developers to have muliplat games look better on 360.So this is the biggest bullshit ive heard since Wii HD.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHhahhahahahaha

Ok you laugh but, can you answer this question?

Why does Killzone 3 look better than any Xbox360 game and why cant any Multiplat game look as good as Killzone 3.

Ive seen comparisons on youtube with Killzone vs Crysis and Killzone looks better.

So can you answer my question?

Crysis 2 does look better than killzone 3. Killzone hides in darkness, while Crysis bathes in light. Many reviewers said Crysis 2 on the xbox 360 is the best looking console game.

I wonder how much sony pays their online defenders.


All Crysis and Rage have proven is that the 360 can port PC games better because of its hardware, not that its more powerful. The PS3 demands games be made specifically for its hardware. Second of all Crysis and Rage are open world games where as Killzone is more of a corridor shooter. Now if Sony makes Killzone 3 an open world shooter we can talk. Killzone is STILL the best exclusive that harnesses the power of a console which is tailor made for it. Crysis 2 is the best port a console can get at the moment.

If the console versions are ports of PC games I wonder what they did with the PC versions? Because they both released obvious console ports on PC.



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!