Rainbird said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Rainbird said:
goforgold said:
pezus said:
What excuse did he have for the PC version? Surely not tight memory... |
no no no that shit doesn't count here.....just typical behavior from the 360 community, carry on
|
You know what typical behavior there is in this thread? PS3 fans being butthurt that some developer raises legitimate critizisms about their platform. What he said is 100% correct, and those exact points are extremely important to RAGE, because of its technology.
It's not id that don't know their stuff, it's the PS3 that can't keep up.
|
It's not that the PS3 cannot keep up. Gamers still get the Rage experience on the PS3 and on one disc. The problem is that games need to be made specifically for the PS3 for them to truly shine. We've known for the past five years.
|
Not with the way RAGE works. I gave a short explanation in my last post to you, I'll gladly expand on it if you want to know more. 
|
Thats perfectly fine. let me know more, but the real issue of backlash is coming from the PC gamers, not the console gamers. Carmack is getting backhanded by all of them for not making the game up to par and now Carmack has stated that the consoles don't run with not even 1/10 of a PC's power. He's blaming the PS3 for his troubles when the PS3 owners are not the ones who are complaining. He's also stated that PC is no longer the lead platform and games are made in mind where the larger paying audience is. This is fine....but its not like they wont rip his game for fun out of spite.
