Rainbird said:
Hah, that's what I get for not doing my homework, I just figured you had it figured out. Even so, I still don't see much point in paying extra for a dual core CPU. The Galaxy S II is remarkably smooth, but even the HTC Radar (with its 1 GHz processor and 512 MB of RAM), one of the new low end WP7 devices, is fairly smooth as well. |
lol, I never said dual core didn't take more juice... just not as big as a hit as the bigger screens or LTE. (though yes, 'very minimal' was a bad choice of words)
Meaning, if screen size is same and both have or do not have LTE, then sure there will be a slight difference in battery life between the two.. however, if the newer phone has a larger screen AND LTE where the older one didn't (as will be the case for most people upgrading) then the dual core is not item to think about when considering potential battery life hit. Hell... LTE is by far the biggest hit right now. Any other phone will still last most people the same time frame as their previous phones based on their normal usage. (for me that's usually an all day charge on smartphones)
Additionally, the Nexus Prime is reported to have either an already larger battery or a massive battery, so I'm not worried one way or the other.
But, it comes down to what's now and what's coming. As any new cpu tech rolls out, you may not notice being an early adopter an significant difference. But as it ages, that new tech becomes far more obvious.
Android 4.0 ICS is designed for dual core CPUs. It will take advantage of it. While the current mobile OS, Gingerbread, does not. So a dual core phone (Galaxy S II) on Gingerbread won't show a huge difference.. but when it gets ICS, you'll know it.








