x_DMX_x said:
I honestly dont know what your trying to state but, im just going to say this and take this as a SERIOUS statement by me.If the PS3 at launch was $300 it would be sitting at atleast, ATLEAST 70million units sold.FACT almost 9 of my friends who game with me on XBL said they didnt buy a PS3 because of the $600 price point thats 9 of my friends imagina everyone who loves the PS2 who didnt buy it because of the $600 price point.Well all im saying is that if the PS3 was launched at about $300-$350 dollars it wouldve sold like hot cakes.I didnt buy my PS3 at launch and im a playstation fan its because im not paying $600 for something that didnt have any games at the time it wasnt greatly marketed but, now the PS3 is the best gaming console that gives you your moneys worth. |
My point can be summed up by the following question:
If "Sony has never failed to give fans what they want" (your words) why did your 9 friends buy an XBox 360 rather than a PS3?
If "Sony has never failed to give fans what they want" one would assume that every PS2 owner would have upgraded to the PS3. The fact that (roughly) 2/3 of PS2 fans did not upgrade to the PS3 is evidence that Sony has failed spectacularly in giving the fans what they wanted. The prediction that Sony will dominate because they have "never failed to give fans what they want" is horribly flawed being that the PS3’s relative poor performance is due to Sony making a significant mistake and failing to give their fans the affordable system they wanted.







