By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ishiki on 05 October 2011
Edit Thread
sapphi_snake said:
ishiki said:

that doesn't mean guilty. People get coaxed into guilty verdict often.  

Knox's lawyers argued that her purported confession to being in the house during the killing was not true, claiming she had made the admission under no sleep and extreme duress and stress. 

The prosecution didn't do they're job or she is indeed not guilty. if they had any other evidence other than possibly a "police coerced confession" The evidence was faulty. And the motive was "she killed for no reason at all."

whether you liked it or not, or whether you like her or not. this isn't sufficient evidence. And it's italy's court so whot he hell knows what they do there. The only one with evidence is guede.

The problem is is that unlike the other 2. Gued has evidence against him. And His prison time was reduced in half for implicating the other 2 but this was after changing his story as well which resulted in his prison sentence getting cut in half.

Kacey anthony hid her burried child, and had a 200,000$ search, to find a child she knew was dead. This isn't in the same category really, other then both prosecuters possibly sucking.


On another note. Unless you're john lennon. I think the public remembers the killer more than the person who was killed. 

What reason did Ted Bundy have to kill anyone?

I said they needed more than that evidence. Which they didn't have or bungled away. I don't see how anyone can possibly think they should be imprisoned based on that other than for slandering. And she already served her sentence for slander. 

People thinking they're guilty without concrete evidence, is the same thing as those rascist people "thinking" troy davis was guilty. (which I know you thought was dumb).
Thinking she's guilty is fine. But to believe that "thinking is enough evidence to put her in jail or worse; is a different circumstance. In the past this line of thinking has caused witch hunts.

She acts suspicious imo, but that's it. But, she has an explanation that explains it, manufactured or true it makes sense. Which is police coercion, and then not knowing what to do afterward. In the U.S. from my experience they try to get you to say what they want through really annoying, repetive, and condescending questions because the cops think they're right. 

Bundy was weird with the confessions initially and probably never confessed to all of them, nor was that the reason he got put in prison. Evidence was against him. And his reason for killing was that certain values like "thou shall not kill" was merely subjective and he said this.  Thus making him a sociopath. They were not able to prove or come up with sufficient evidence that Amanda Knox was a sociopath.