Dr.Grass said:
I should probably ask my university supervisors... "Dismissing something because it sounds absurd is not science. Look at the double slit experiment. I don't know how it would work, but there is nothing wrong with the concept as far as contradicting what we observe already." My question would be how you would accelerate a human being to greater than c since we have tons of experience that it isn't even possible for particles as light as protons and neutrons. Or were you only referring to 'signalling back in time'? For this I also disagree. Mostly because we haven't seen any signals yet Yeah, signalling. The only work on time travel I know has been purely mathematical, setting out the conditions for time travel to occur theoretically (tachyons, rotating cylinders of infinte length, matter with negative mass or negative energy if we found any, and so on). Of course we haven't observed anything like that, I'm just not prepared to rule it out. |








but also because of HUP. Perhaps you can give me a peer-reviewed
paper that develops the idea of time-travel?